Judicial Reference

Greenbriar Homes Communities, Inc. v. Superior Court(Couris)
117 Cal. App. 4th 337 (3d Dist. Mar. 8, 2004)

Homeowners brought claims against petitioner to recover for damages allegedly caused by petitioner's defective construction. Homeowners included original purchasers (those who had bought their homes from petitioner) and non-original purchasers who were not in privity of contract with petitioner. The sale agreements between petitioner and the original purchasers required all disputes to be determined by a judicial referee.



As to the non-original purchasers, the Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's denial of petitioner's motion to compel judicial reference, finding that the non-original purchasers, "[h]aving never consented to judicial reference, [ ] cannot now be forced to participate in a general reference by the court." As to the original purchasers, the Court of Appeal vacated the trial court's ruling denying petitioner's motion to compel judicial reference, finding that the reference provision in the sales agreement was not unconscionable.

The Court of Appeal also rejected homeowners' argument that the potential for multiple actions invalidated the parties' reference agreement, holding that a court may not invalidate a valid contractual agreement, such as the sales agreement at issue, without statutory authorization therefor.

For more information please contact a member of the Real Estate and Construction Law Blog Editorial Team.

We invite you to suggest topics for the blog. We are happy to consider questions or comments pertaining to general points of Real Estate and Construction Law. If you desire legal advice, please contact one of our attorneys directly though the 'Contact Us' page of this blog.

Your use of the Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Real Estate and Construction Law Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP. Your e-mail will not create an attorney-client relationship. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP will have no duty to keep confidential the information that you are now submitting to the firm.
Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?